In this video, Lawrence Lessig talks
about the need for net neutrality in order to increase competition
over the internet, and for the FCC to set a network neutrality
policy, which is opposed by internet providers. He states that we
need to preserve what has worked in driving the economy, and what has
worked is a neutral network. Personally, I am in favor of network
neutrality because as a customer, more competition is better for me,
and the ability of broadband providers to control what I see as a
user, and possibly artificially removing competition and creating
scarcity, means what I buy may be uncompetitive.
Lessig offers some ideas such as zero
discriminatory surcharge, or ZDS, where ISPs shouldn't inflate prices
based on artificial scarcity and charging more to certain companies
for the same service. He states that it would be fine for an ISP to
charge a certain amount for certain data, such as video, as long as
each company is charged the same. In his example, iFilm pays twice as
much as Google for the same service, and iFilm may not have a choice
because of the lack of competition. There could be a
non-discriminatory surcharge for video data, as long as each company
pays the same, so there is no incentive for destructive business
models.
According to the video, it has been
shown that net neutrality is the best option for economic growth,
especially for businesses that depend on the internet for their core
business processes, such as YouTube. It is expressed that lack of
competition and choices in broadband providers has caused the U.S. To
drop in rankings of broadband penetration when compared to other
countries, and that the lack of regulation has facilitated that
issue. As users and customers, it is time we started to treat
broadband like a commodity, and promote competition in this industry.
Lessig,
L. (2008). Lawerence lessig:neutral networks works. [0].
Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mYbYG-nXVA
Image
retrieved from:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bennet-kelley/net-neutrality-green-tech_b_335237.html
No comments:
Post a Comment